Showing posts with label John Zaffis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Zaffis. Show all posts

Thursday, May 31, 2018

Haunted Objects: Residual Energy - Part 5

By Reverend Mark Hunnemann

The series so far:

Residual Energy And Haunts by Mark Hunnemann - Part 1

Residual Energy And Haunts by Mark Hunnemann - Part 2

Residual Energy And Haunts by Mark Hunnemann - Part 3

Distinguishing Between Intelligent Haunts & Residual Haunts - Part 4


In this chapter we are going to expand our analysis of residual energy/haunts to alleged residually haunted objects—objects which are haunted with residual energy.  There is no doubt that some objects, like some homes, are ‘odd’—they are purchased and bad things start to happen—too many to explain away as coincidence. Can objects retain negative energy much like the environment in which there is an alleged residual haunt? The only difference it would seem is that the alleged residual energy is localized in the object itself. Perhaps you have heard of John Zaffis and his show “The Haunted Collector”? I watched several episodes and often he would refer to objects ‘absolutely’ would retain the negative energy of the people and events associated with them. A few of the more well known haunted objects are: the Dibbuk box, Annabelle the doll, and the mirror at Myrtles Plantation.

Speaking of John Zaffis, Lisa Hix says: “What parapsychologists refer to as a ‘haunting’ is like what you and I would think of as a recording. Residual energy is trapped in whatever object it is, and it replays itself. There’s nothing intelligent about it. It just plays the same thing over and over.” Lisa Hix

Several things I want to say.

1. There seems to be a general consensus by paranormal investigators that objects can be haunted either by ghosts or residual energy but we are going to focus on residual energy being retained in an object. Humans MUST go before the Sovereign Judge of heaven and earth immediately after death, so they cannot haunt an object or a house, but that is topic for another day. ‘Seeing Ghosts through God's Eyes’ is my analysis of the ghost issue. The question is this: can a traumatic event associated with an object cause that object to retain the negative energy of that event? For example, if a sword was used to murder someone could it retain that energy?  Could this object become a place memory—a recording tape of this event by storing its energy?

2. The short answer is an emphatic NO! Everything I said re residual energy/haunts applies directly to this issue because the exact same phenomenon is said to happen, except it is localized in a single object and not entire surroundings of home/office.

If..if there was a transfer of energy during this murder, what kind of energy is it? Electrical, thermal, chemical? Second, whatever energy was emitted from the event when the blade struck its victim, this energy would immediately dissipate into the atmosphere. Imagine putting a drop of food coloring in the ocean. Is it destroyed? No, but it might as well be because  it is so watered down that it is virtually gone-- thousands of miles of ocean. Same with emitted energy-it must dissipate into the earth's atmosphere 100 miles high surrounding the earth. I have a space heater in front of my chair in which I am writing. It will warm up this small area but it will not heat the entire room--why not? The thermal energy dissipates. Neither will the heat coming out of it make a bee-line for an object in my room and store there and keep in hot indefinitely. An object like this sword or an antique cannot retain energy any more than your room will stay warm once you turn the heat off. Energy is energy and cannot remain clustered in an object any more than a drop of food coloring will stay clustered together if you drop it in the ocean/glass.

As long as ice melts in liquid warmer than it, then the second and third laws of thermodynamics are absolutely valid.  One man tried to argue that it had questions raised recently but I’ve studied the literature and in the real world it is still absolute.

My point is that an object cannot be haunted by residual energy because energy cannot remain stored in the object. To state otherwise is to contradict one of the most basic, absolute laws of science-God’s laws in nature. Remember, I am not disputing an object can be ‘haunted’—I’m just saying, as I did with residual haunting in general, it cannot be caused by natural forces. If you have not read my earlier chapters on residual energy, please do because I don’t want to repeat myself, and I need to address another question. How do you distinguish between  an object haunted by ghost and residual energy? That encounters the same insuperable problems associated with intelligent and residual haunts.

3. If it is not residual energy causing the object to be haunted what is? Well, first it is not ‘haunted’?  Nor is it possessed—only conscious beings can be possessed. A doll cannot be possessed. However, demons are very territorial and for various reasons they do attach to objects just as they attach to homes and people. Some people and many animals are sensitive to the presence of the demonic attached to an object. They will stare or bark at it for hours.

Lisa Hix states the following: On his FAQ at the Museum of the Paranormal, Zaffis agrees that such phenomena are all about energy, but he has a different theory about how the energy got there. “With most of the items in the museum, they have been used in rituals, usually when spells are being cast,” he writes. “Although the items are not ‘possessed,’ … items can hold energy within or around them, and it is usually the result of the energy being sent to the object by an individual.”

He is half-way right there. What I thought instructive is that this expert in occult objects recognizes that there is a common theme or back-story to these objects—ritualistic activity, spell casting or curses being sent by an individual are attached to an object. The curse or ritual summons a demon who then is all too happy to attach to this object; giving it a legal right to attach and attack its owners. Demons, not negative energy, haunt objects. It is pure evil and we need to stop calling it negative energy.

Contrary to what the well known psychic Sylvia Browne said: “There’s no such thing as a curse. That’s just a goofy fortune-teller’s way of getting money.” No ma'am..you are wrong. Dead wrong.

Just as demons attach to dead idols that people worship (1 Cor. 10, etc.), so they can attach to objects that have been presented in an occultic ritualistic fashion. An example might be the sword of a Freemason.  My dear friend Laura Maxwell told me today of a lovely piece of jewelry that was given to her, but she got weird vibes off it. She later discovered that it was a Hindu object, and she got rid of it. This is instructive because it illustrates how common this problem is, and how anybody may be affected by it. Much artwork or furniture or jewelry was crafted by pagans with pagan intentions or occultic symbolism. And as Zaffis reminds us, most of the infested/cursed objects are due to some form of rituals in which spells are being cast; that kind of activity is precisely what opens doors to demonic. That is a very significant point and fits hand in glove with our premise of demonic intervention. If you curse something, then it is an open invitation for demonic attachment; ‘legal rights’ have been granted to it/them.

Or take the sword we talked about earlier used in a murder: that MAY cause a demon to become attached to it because it took the life of God’s image bearer—thus an attack on God Himself. On one case, my client’s husband had been in special forces and was dispatched to Iraq. He was a sniper and he had this tiny troll doll he put on his gun barrel, which was used to kill many people, and he brought it home and was obsessed with it. He placed it here, and then he placed it there, and then it started moving on its own. In addition, he also brought home objects from Saddam Hussein’s palace (one of them)—pictures—one of the dogs playing cards….others more occult looking. Due to all the murder, torture, sexual uncleaness, and madness that took place in his palaces, it’s no wonder that they are infested, and the objects in them. No doubt these were part of the reason this woman’s home was being terrorized.

She had been having sex with her boyfriend and he started experiencing problems due to his close connection to the infestation. I instructed them to stop but they didn’t listen, and he became partially possessed—eyes turned black, loss of memory, and aberrant behavior; and a minor exorcism had to be performed. So, ‘haunted objects’ can cause one’s life to turn into a living nightmare; even something as small as a one-inch troll doll. When we went through all of his ‘stuff’ and either tossed it or blessed it, a shadow demon was seen fleeing from the storage building.

So, the source of an objects ‘haunting’ is the demonic and not residual energy.

4. How is obtained? It seems that antique stores are especially vulnerable because you have old objects and you have no idea what kind of people previously owned it. Also, if they had demonic activity in their home, it also may attach to particular objects in the home. Care must be taken when buying antiques or even used items or clothes.

Don’t be paranoid because junking is supposed to be fun! You just need to be familiar with occult symbols. Be especially aware of items that might have some connection with a fraternal organization, like Freemasonry. If it feels weird, better safe than sorry.

And if activity begins in your home after buying an object then the best thing to do is get rid of it.

5. How do I get rid of it? Get rid of it!  Don’t do EMF readings or especially do not do EVPs—that will make it worse. Don’t do like Zaffis and now Zak Bagans and start your your own haunted museum! I used to collect items I took from people’s homes but I learned that it was better to just throw it out…which is what I did. If it is a very expensive item, you may try expelling the demon or getting help to do so. But if you are confident the object is cursed then the best thing to do is dump it in the trash, burn it, or bury it. The bible has examples of godly people doing all three with occult objects. Pray the blood of Jesus to bind the demons…and to forbid them from following you home. For example, it is needed to ‘close’ a Ouija Board before you burn it or it will just leave the object and possibly attach to you.

Once again, if someone has mis-identified the nature of the problem with the object then it could cause serious problems. If you are told that it is merely residual energy and not harmful, and you decide to hang onto the item, then your life may turn into a wide-awake nightmare. Whatever demon/s associated with the object, will eventually begin to turn upon its owner. They do not care as much about things as they do wrecking and breaking people down, and pulverizing them. So, whether the ‘spiritual cancer’ is in the home or attached to an object, it will wreck havoc in a multitude of ways. Get rid of it!

If you have been exposed to a demon attached object then it has had an affect on you. Realize that just because you were baptized does not mean you are saved. Nor does a simple belief in the existence of God and Jesus save you. First step is to ask Christ to save you if you haven’t already: confess that you have fallen short of His holy laws and need to be forgiven…ask Christ to forgive you and turn from your self centered life to having Jesus as the leader of your life. Open up your empty hands of faith and accept God’s free gift of salvation which Christ earned for you—and bow before the finished work of Christ on the cross. As Jesus to forgive your sins and He will—past, present and future. And eternal life is a personal relationship with God through Jesus.


Mark Hunnemann is the author of Seeing Ghosts Through God's Eyes: A Worldview Analysis of Earthbound Spirits. It's also available in eBook format.


Friday, January 13, 2017

Culture Watch: Television & Demonaphobia

By Reverend Mark Hunnemann

This blog was originally posted on December 7, 2012.

The deception began with a bang. The DT crew (Destination Truth) went to the Mayan ruins, which was the site of untold number of human sacrifices to idols—which as the bible tells us is participating in demons. In light of this, one would have thought they would have put demons at least on their possible suspect list for the accelerated paranormal activity there; they didn’t. Instead, team DT posited, before even went there, that the recent accelerated activity was either due to the sacrificial victims or the Mayan warriors. Even though scared to death at points, demons were not even an option.

I try to stay in touch with popular culture, so I watch as many of the haunted TV shows as I can. What I am sharing is based on what I witnessed over the last month of watching the following shows: Destination Truth, Ghost Adventures, Haunted Collector, A Haunting, The Dead Files, Paranormal Witness, Haunted Highway, and one more about hauntings at colleges but I can’t for the life of me remember the name.  Sheesh. That is eight shows on three nights of the week (Tues., Wed., Friday). People’s beliefs and worldviews are unconsciously shaped by exposure to this much haunted TV, but this is but a tip of the paranormal iceberg on TV. One list had about fifty shows, which in some form or fashion, focus on the assumed reality of ghosts. FIFTY!  Of course they are not all on the same season schedule, and a few on the list are now cancelled—but as with The Ghost Whisperer or Charmed, re-runs are current with a number of these. That is an incredible number of shows, which reveals how we are witnessing a paradigm shift in our understanding of spirituality (topic for another day). This phenomenon is both a shaper of culture as well as a reflection of it.

My purpose in watching all these shows was in part to answer this question: is TV phobic regarding demons? The undeniable answer is “yes”; the vast majority of these shows avoid fingering demons as the cause of supernatural activity in homes or businesses. Whether it is the individuals or the networks (or both) that are demonaphobic, the reality is that the phobia is ubiquitous. As with the opening scene with DT, it is astounding how hesitant folks are on these shows to assign the blame on demons for even the most despicable activity. For varying reasons, the almost monolithic consensus of investigators is that demonic encounters are rare. So, in that regard the TV shows are mirroring current beliefs in this field. One quick example. The much respected John Zaffis is called in to assuage the fears of a young mom. There has been verbal threats and physical violence, to the point she is terrified. During an EVP session (red flag!) John asks the spirit if it is angry with the family, and child’s voice answered, "no". Based almost entirely on this captured EVP, John interprets all of this scratching, pushing, and threats as an expression of trust that this child ghost feels with the young mom. A touching scene follows, and I am feeling nauseous. That is baloney sir. Do you always trust children’s voices? What would you think of a living child who scratched and pushed people and threatened them? I would have had my rear-end whipped good as a child if I did half of what that demon did to those people. That is calling wrong…. right-something the bible condemns. On another episode his tech, Brian, got a long triple scratch down his back, and demons were not mentioned at all—not amongst themselves (that we know of) or with the client. Does anybody else find that problematic? Two per show… that makes eight hair raising episodes in a month, in which a world famous, professing Christian demonologist does not even mention demons.

While watching Paranormal Witness tonight I thought that, finally, they will call a spade a spade. Two or three deputies are witness to some hair raising activity in an old theatre. After what he called demon like activity, one of them quit. It seemed that, given all the focus on the sheer evil of this entity, that a demon was going to be the culprit. Wrong. By the end, it was reported that a young man had died in a fire there and all the activity was then viewed through that prism. So, in all those shows I watched, I do not recall a demon being seen as the cause of the supernatural activity. Moreover, most of the time, demons were not even mentioned. We are talking several dozen episodes. THAT frequency and repetition is clearly influencing people’s views regarding both ghosts and the demonic.  It makes me weep.

I find this very troubling because it is only reinforcing in the audience’s minds that ghosts are the only plausible explanation for supernatural activity. It is shaping their view of supernatural reality…millions of people. “Yes demons are real, but rare”. Sound familiar?  It should, because demonic rarity is the majority view of investigators. Sure it happens but even the most “negative” (grown to really dislike that word) entities are almost always viewed as irregular humans or possibly some whacked out dimensional being (eg energy vampires—demons can mimic that). If it smells like sulfur, levitation is occurring, tables are flying across the room, apportation, extreme aversion to blessed objects, client speaking backwards in Latin, and people are being hurt, THEN folks will discuss the possibility of demonic presence. Sheeesh….(OK, a bit exaggerated) Once you introduce the concept of ghosts (including poltergeist and residual), then identifying demons is hopelessly subjective.

Stop! Everyone believes that demons are deceptive, so why the almost fervent hesitancy to label something demonic unless all the aforementioned is present? Even veteran, biblical demonologists fall prey to this faulty logic when they assume they will always feel heaviness in the air if there is a demonic infestation. If you have a strong gift of discernment (there are gradations of sensitivity), then that is a horse of a different color. But generally, demons can leave a palpable sense of peace and love. That is certainly an implicate of the angel of light principle, and there is a plethora of anecdotal evidence to support this. They can control the vibe of a house. How convincing is an angel-cloaked demon going to be if everyone has the heeby-jeebies around them or feel nauseous and so on? Back to the fervent hesitancy.

Satan is not omnipotent, but he is showing considerable power in how he has promoted this demonaphobia. The issue is not what you personally believe—the issue is, what is the message coming across the TV? This was an experiment to observe. The bottom line is that if the angel of light principle is real—and it is—then there is no way to make a list of criteria for demonic presence; they can and do break all the rules and all the stereotypes. And to rule out from the get-go the possibility of demonic activity is not science, it is ideological assumptions. (REPEAT) It is the opposite of true science…destination untruth. 

Demonaphobia….that is what is plastered all over TV these days. This is a call to all bible believing Christians to be salt and light for the glory of God.

Mark Hunnemann is the author of Seeing Ghosts Through God's Eyes: A Worldview Analysis of Earthbound Spirits. It's also available in eBook format.

Friday, September 4, 2015

Worldviews...Bringing Our Thoughts Under Christ's Lordship

By Reverend Mark Hunnemann


Last time we looked at epistemology, which deals with how we acquire knowledge. We noted that it is important to give reasons for why we believe what we believe. When we are not aware of our reasons for believing something, it is difficult to analyze or evaluate that belief, and it is certainly difficult to argue it with someone else (argue in logical sense).

You may not have heard of Sena Naslund as an author, but perhaps you have heard of Dean Koontz. I was surprised to discover that he has devoted an entire novel series on a character named Odd Thomas--a short order cook in a small CA town. He acquired the ability to see and communicate with trapped spirits. In this series he attempts to help spirits who had been treated unjustly. Novels, especially a series written by another bestseller like Koontz, have the ability to substantially alter a person's worldview...without the reader being consciously aware of it. Perhaps before reading his novel/s the reader either did not believe in ghosts or was on the fence, but afterwards it would take a conscious effort to NOT be effected in the direction of belief.

Similarly, I noted Wednesday night that there was a TV show, "Haunted Mine", which I watched--been without TV for several months. What is next: "Haunted Honeymoons"?! This is not a fad and it (the assumption that trapped spirits exist) is particularly compelling when viewed via the medium of TV.  Seeing is believing, right? Not if you misinterpret the data.
                                                                                  
A few nights ago I heard an interview with John Zaffis and another well known demonologist. I always enjoy listening to Zaffis because of his immense learning and experience. Much wisdom was shared, and then the host asked how they make decisions.....determining what is there and what to do. John said they leave after a day or 2 of investigating to do some "diagnosing"--a key word they used several times..."they needed to look over the evidence to discern what is trapped spirits and if any demons" (Zaffis). At this point, I groaned out loud.

Is the diagnosing by a demonologist (or investigator) similar to that of a doctor? Yes and No. Yes, in that both deal with studying symptoms, and then seeking to find the cause and cure for a problem. But even in this regard, a case could be made that the "ailments" a demonologist deals with are much more serious than those which a medical doctor handles--which should give pause to anyone seeking to enter this field. No, in that there is a distinct, explicit spiritual component to the paranormal diagnostic process. Please remember that the paranormal is not ultimately a scientific issue but a theological issue, because science is UNABLE to uncover the identity of supernatural entities.What I want us to see is that during this very important diagnostic process, one's worldview WILL effect how we see and interpret the paranormal facts., and we are almost always unaware of these strong, interior influences.

God rejects the false wisdom of the world and calls His people to radical obedience ( 1 Cor. 1-2)--thinking according to God's norms is a crucial aspect of this radical call to discipleship. In a word, God is an intellectual authoritarian. This is a touchy subject for modern man who is insistent on total freedom of speech and thought. However, God's intellectual authoritarianism is the source of true intellectual freedom. Human thinking must be subject to a norm or criterion. If we reject God as our intellectual norm, then we must either create an idol and find some other ultimate norm, or capitulate to skepticism, which is intellectual death....both are, actually. The philosophical trends of rationalism, empiricism, and subjectivism have been created by non-Christian philosophers in a  futile attempt to justify human knowledge apart from bowing before the God of the bible.

Everyone has a worldview--a basic commitment of the heart translated into a way of seeing reality--both Christians and non-Christians have a worldview. Hence, it is simply not true to say that Christians are "biased" or "prejudiced" in their presuppositions (worldviews) in diagnosing of paranormal problems, and that nonbelievers are "neutral" or "unbiased" in the same process. Both groups are equally biased and prejudiced., when interpreting the paranormal facts. Jesus said, "He is who is not for Me is against Me." The non-Christian is as passionate about rejecting the true God as the Christian is in loving Him.

In the 1960's Thomas Kuhn wrote a groundbreaking book, "The Structure of Scientific Revolution". Though not a Christian, Kuhn made numerous very astute observations regarding how we "diagnose" scientific facts. He asserted that nobody is fully objective in their viewing and interpreting of data. The scientific community (think paranormal community) has shared beliefs which act as a paradigmatic grid though which they sift all data. If data or facts arise which are contrary to their basic community assumptions, then they will NOT BE ABLE TO SEE THIS DATA OR EVIDENCE. Their perception has been obscured by a distorted paradigm (worldview) to the point that they actually cannot see certain aspects of reality. It is only when the anomalies multiply to a certain point(says Kuhn)...when the contrary evidence is popping up all over the place, that the scientific community awakens from its slumber and is then be able to. begin to "see" what had been there the whole time. 

This is leading philosopher of science is stating that pure objectivity is impossible. In fact, for a Christian, "pure objectivity" is the last thing we should desire in study of paranormal phenomena. Pure objectivity implies that there are "neutral or brute facts' out there just waiting for us to give them meaning and identity. Not so! Every square inch of the cosmos belongs to the Lord, upon which He has placed His victory flag, and cries out "MINE!!". Every fact--literally every molecule to every star-- is a theistic fact...a fact ordained from all eternity and thus, pre-interpreted by God Almighty. There are no neutral or brute facts, which just exist in an anonymous void or vacuum, waiting for some human to come along and affirm its existence and meaning. God has already done that, and we are to re-interpret the paranormal phenomena as closely as possible to God's original pre-interpretation. Viewing facts or paranormal phenomena through a biblical worldview enables us to be faithful interpreters of God's world. Pure objectivity is not attainable, nor even desirable.

In conclusion, let is re-visit John Zaffis's diagnosis. May I say humbly and gently that Mr Zaffis, simply by virtue of his belief in trapped spirits, will not be able to consistently re-interpret (diagnose) God's pre-interpretation of the paranormal facts. God has made it clear that trapped spirits do not exist, BUT if we believe in them anyway, then we will see what we want or expect to see in the evidence review. God is an intellectual authoritarian, and it is our duty to humble ourselves before him. Otherwise, we dishonor God, hurt the client by giving them bad advice, and hurt ourselves as well.

Demons can mimic ANYTHING. Since that is the case how can one diagnose or find a criterion that would distinguish between a human spirit and a demon? The host asked him what the diagnosis involved, and he did not specify but gave a general response about sifting through data to make decisions. You affirm that you are a Christian John, please...please think like one.

"Seeing Ghosts through God's Eyes" (also in a Kindle edition)...please consider purchasing my book which uses science, logic, and the bible to analyze the true source of power behind paranormal activity.

Friday, October 31, 2014

Culture Watch: Television & Demonaphobia

By Reverend Mark Hunnemann

NOTE: Due to a computer problem, Rev. Hunnemann doesn't have a new blog post for this week. This important blog originally posted on 12/7/12 is being rerun.

The deception began with a bang. The DT crew (Destination Truth) went to the Mayan ruins, which was the site of untold number of human sacrifices to idols—which as the bible tells us is participating in demons. In light of this, one would have thought they would have put demons at least on their possible suspect list for the accelerated paranormal activity there; they didn’t. Instead, team DT posited, before even went there, that the recent accelerated activity was either due to the sacrificial victims or the Mayan warriors. Even though scared to death at points, demons were not even an option.

I try to stay in touch with popular culture, so I watch as many of the haunted TV shows as I can. What I am sharing is based on what I witnessed over the last month of watching the following shows: Destination Truth, Ghost Adventures, Haunted Collector, A Haunting, The Dead Files, Paranormal Witness, Haunted Highway, and one more about hauntings at colleges but I can’t for the life of me remember the name.  Sheesh. That is eight shows on three nights of the week (Tues., Wed., Friday). People’s beliefs and worldviews are unconsciously shaped by exposure to this much haunted TV, but this is but a tip of the paranormal iceberg on TV. One list had about fifty shows, which in some form or fashion, focus on the assumed reality of ghosts. FIFTY!  Of course they are not all on the same season schedule, and a few on the list are now cancelled—but as with The Ghost Whisperer or Charmed, re-runs are current with a number of these. That is an incredible number of shows, which reveals how we are witnessing a paradigm shift in our understanding of spirituality (topic for another day). This phenomenon is both a shaper of culture as well as a reflection of it.

My purpose in watching all these shows was in part to answer this question: is TV phobic regarding demons? The undeniable answer is “yes”; the vast majority of these shows avoid fingering demons as the cause of supernatural activity in homes or businesses. Whether it is the individuals or the networks (or both) that are demonaphobic, the reality is that the phobia is ubiquitous. As with the opening scene with DT, it is astounding how hesitant folks are on these shows to assign the blame on demons for even the most despicable activity. For varying reasons, the almost monolithic consensus of investigators is that demonic encounters are rare. So, in that regard the TV shows are mirroring current beliefs in this field. One quick example. The much respected John Zaffis is called in to assuage the fears of a young mom. There has been verbal threats and physical violence, to the point she is terrified. During an EVP session (red flag!) John asks the spirit if it is angry with the family, and child’s voice answered, "no". Based almost entirely on this captured EVP, John interprets all of this scratching, pushing, and threats as an expression of trust that this child ghost feels with the young mom. A touching scene follows, and I am feeling nauseous. That is baloney sir. Do you always trust children’s voices? What would you think of a living child who scratched and pushed people and threatened them? I would have had my rear-end whipped good as a child if I did half of what that demon did to those people. That is calling wrong…. right-something the bible condemns. On another episode his tech, Brian, got a long triple scratch down his back, and demons were not mentioned at all—not amongst themselves (that we know of) or with the client. Does anybody else find that problematic? Two per show… that makes eight hair raising episodes in a month, in which a world famous, professing Christian demonologist does not even mention demons.

While watching Paranormal Witness tonight I thought that, finally, they will call a spade a spade. Two or three deputies are witness to some hair raising activity in an old theatre. After what he called demon like activity, one of them quit. It seemed that, given all the focus on the sheer evil of this entity, that a demon was going to be the culprit. Wrong. By the end, it was reported that a young man had died in a fire there and all the activity was then viewed through that prism. So, in all those shows I watched, I do not recall a demon being seen as the cause of the supernatural activity. Moreover, most of the time, demons were not even mentioned. We are talking several dozen episodes. THAT frequency and repetition is clearly influencing people’s views regarding both ghosts and the demonic.  It makes me weep.

I find this very troubling because it is only reinforcing in the audience’s minds that ghosts are the only plausible explanation for supernatural activity. It is shaping their view of supernatural reality…millions of people. “Yes demons are real, but rare”. Sound familiar?  It should, because demonic rarity is the majority view of investigators. Sure it happens but even the most “negative” (grown to really dislike that word) entities are almost always viewed as irregular humans or possibly some whacked out dimensional being (eg energy vampires—demons can mimic that). If it smells like sulfur, levitation is occurring, tables are flying across the room, apportation, extreme aversion to blessed objects, client speaking backwards in Latin, and people are being hurt, THEN folks will discuss the possibility of demonic presence. Sheeesh….(ok, a bit exaggerated). Once you introduce the concept of ghosts (including poltergeist and residual), then identifying demons is hopelessly subjective.

Stop! Everyone believes that demons are deceptive, so why the almost fervent hesitancy to label something demonic unless all the aforementioned is present? Even veteran, biblical demonologists fall prey to this faulty logic when they assume they will always feel heaviness in the air if there is a demonic infestation. If you have a strong gift of discernment (there are gradations of sensitivity), then that is a horse of a different color. But generally, demons can leave a palpable sense of peace and love. That is certainly an implicate of the angel of light principle, and there is a plethora of anecdotal evidence to support this. They can control the vibe of a house. How convincing is an angel-cloaked demon going to be if everyone has the heeby-jeebies around them or feel nauseous and so on? Back to the fervent hesitancy.

Satan is not omnipotent, but he is showing considerable power in how he has promoted this demonaphobia. The issue is not what you personally believe—the issue is, what is the message coming across the TV? This was an experiment to observe. The bottom line is that if the angel of light principle is real—and it is—then there is no way to make a list of criteria for demonic presence; they can and do break all the rules and all the stereotypes. And to rule out from the get-go the possibility of demonic activity is not science, it is ideological assumptions. (REPEAT) It is the opposite of true science…destination untruth. 

Demonaphobia….that is what is plastered all over TV these days. This is a call to all bible believing Christians to be salt and light for the glory of God.

Mark Hunnemann is the author of Seeing Ghosts Through God's Eyes: A Worldview Analysis of Earthbound Spirits. It's also available in eBook format.

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Sanity’s Twin: Part 2, The Devil’s Door



It never ceases to amaze me how we find out about what we do.  It’s like some spirit from the other side just guides us to reveal a deeper connection and story then we would have ever guessed when exposing fraud and criminal activity.


I’ve had the privilege of knowing so many different souls out there and some very surprising people that would absolutely shock you to hear their stories.  I know better then most the truth that lays out there in the paranormal that boarders beyond the edge of reality to seemingly so strange and yet, so mysterious and fascinating that “seeing is believing”.  Yes, I’ve seen things myself and experienced amazing events and I have talked to some very credible people that have too.

But these people we expose, they are not really paranormal people.  They are people looking to use the paranormal and it’s community for their own agenda.  They are not truthful, make things up and you’ll often see them doing things that would point to some not so honest dealings.  Recently, We have found another, whom I wrote about last week.  Now, I’ve gotten a lot of heat for revealing this guy.  People think, I must be wrong and I’m being cruel and even unfair.  Let me just break down HOW we find these people and what we do.

These people have been coming out of the woodwork as attacking us and my network since getting on Christina George.  Now, the fact that they take such a personal interest in the story and often antagonize me by stalking and repeated obnoxious actions tells me something is up and my radar goes off.  I expose people, tick me off, I’m going to at the very least look to see who you are and if you really exist under that name you’re using on Facebook.  It’s what I do.  I make no apologies for it.  There is a reason why someone is really acting all huffy and it usually has something personal to do with it.

Now, when I investigate, I look at what people have out there that they themselves put out there. Frauds tend to be very inconsistent in their lies and they are easy to find.  I usually can find what they are doing, because, much of them tend to be selling something or bragging about themselves.  This is all public anyone can see it without signing into anything web sites and data.

David Rountree, well, he probably takes the cake for alerting me that he’s been up to something in his attacks and actions.  His arrogance is astounding alone and his many posts to people who he thinks are all stupid because they do not share his “scientific” but really often ludicrous way of thinking, has no problem chastising people and calling them dumb.  He seems to not understand a few things doing this.  First, if you call people stupid and act like you’re the only smart one, others will read that and think badly of you.  Secondly, people don’t like rude people period and usually that kind of remark backfires.

Now, what I and Darlene do is risky and we both do not really have any active team in the paranormal.  Anytime you expose frauds you will get slammed back.  It’s part of the process.  We are aware of this and it can destroy a reputation.  Because we care about the field so much, we take that risk and know it well.  We also are targets and get a lot of threats, whether legally or physical threats that include family to some degree and those we are associated with in groups, as friends or as supporters.  However, the fraud exposing is strictly Darlene and I.  The buck stops here folks.

So, as you see, the fact that David reacts this way and then aligns himself with those we have exposed, especially being that he was once a Paranormal Police member himself and is now aligning with one of the first fraudulent psychics that was uncovered many years ago, seems to say to me, there is a reason to truly check this guy out.  AND, we did.

He has on several websites different listings for his education.  In fact, it ranges from a Associate degree, Bachelor’s degree, Master’s Degree and then of course PHD, that he told people of the Paranormal Police back in 2007 or 8 that he had just received but, obviously didn’t.  Now, to top this off, the dates scatter back and forth as if he had a Masters and lost it and then only had Bachelors and on more educated sites where there may be PhD’s actually conversing on the site he put only his Associate degree behind his signature.  Now, why would anyone do this?  I think he needs to show what degree he really has once and for all.  There are many sites complaining he does not appear to have any understanding of true physics and doubt his expertise for his books or radio interviews.

It turns out that David was at the time he threw out his attacks on us, he was promoting events that Carol Malone was doing.  Now, Carol Malone injected herself into the stolen statue case and attempted to extort money from the owners of the statues when during a radio broadcast done by their own side, had Christina admitting she had the statues and that she had never given custody to Carol Malone or her lawyer as she had previously stated.  Meaning, Carol was lying and attempting to exhort money for an appraisal she could not have had done.

The events she is doing are indeed done with the same playbook Ryan Buell did for attempting to collect money 60 days prior.  Or as Buell did, postpone and then cancel the event. If they are doing this with that many days prior to an event means that the buyer may lose their money if they cancel the event and will have no recourse to collect their money due to Paypal policies and that of many credit cards.  Generally, venues are booked before tickets go on sale and that is the right way to do business.  Anything else is risky if the dates can not be locked down for the event at the venues, keeping in mind that the Tombstone event that takes place in 2015 has several venues on the same days.

Now, the rest of the bunch that seem to be posting with David are actually part of the Christina George following that seem to be sticking up for her, (she was previously mentioned as being a fake psychic who had stolen two ancient statues claiming they were demonic and involving John Zaffis name in the mix).  One of her biggest supporters being Lord Rick Rowe, who is a pot smoking, odd fellow that has a stalker web site of anyone he doesn’t like by the name of Theatrical Clowns whom has been stalking people since 2007 on there.  He has no problem threatening, lying, manufacturing evidence as well as harassing anyone that bother’s Christina.

There are several others that he has aligned with that appear to be connected in what they are doing. This is what we call the Paranormal Underground whose main purpose seems to be to shut us up any way they can so they can continue to scam, defraud and pilfer money out of the paranormal community.

Let me also make this clear, while some are connecting John Zaffis to certain alleged involvement with stolen articles, Darlene and I do not believe him to be involved any more then have been contacted by email and never having the items and know he actually has been in contact with the family who had the items stolen.  We have also been seeing some people attempting to say we are slamming John Zaffis or even other celebrities.  We tend to be very vocal in our oppositions and if you can’t see it readily like on this blog, it’s not something we are saying. I have no personal complaint with John Zaffis, though; I do like to tease about haunted objects.  That is not meant as a slam against John Zaffis by any means.  I’m just joking.  That’s just me and my sense of humor.

If you want to know more, read our other blogs, join or like our pages and stay tuned to The Eye on the Paranormal.

Click to enlarge






By Evan Jensen, Producer of Beyond the Edge of Reality Radio Network

Part 1 Sanity's Twin: Kissing Up to the Devil

http://eyeontheparanormal.blogspot.com/2014/08/sanitys-twin-kissing-up-to-devil.html


Christina George Story with Carol Malone

http://eyeontheparanormal.blogspot.com/2014/07/the-christina-george-story-as-web-spins.html


Rick Rowe and his Theatrical Clown site

http://eyeontheparanormal.blogspot.com/2014/08/smoking-toking-rick-rowe-profile-of.html


Facebook Pages

https://www.facebook.com/beyondtheedgeofrealitynetwork

https://www.facebook.com/paranormalbureauofinvestigation

https://www.facebook.com/beyondtheedgeofrealitydesigns

Web Pages

http://beyondtheedgeofreality.net

http://beyondthedgeofreality.com (currently under construction)


Blogs  (Watch for more information on these articles on our blogs.)

http://beyondtheedgeofreality.blogspot.com/

http://hauntedishpeming.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

The Fairy Tale Psychic Case is Cracked, The Christina George Story



There comes a time when you have to completely rejoice at the mistakes of some of those we expose especially when we turn up the heat.  Sometimes, just a bit of pressure gets them to crack like an old egg that has been fermenting in the back of the fridge for to many months forgotten.  When that happens, it’s a “gotcha” type of moment.

One such moment is when a FAKE PSYCHIC named Christina George who actually admits how she stole the statues and that she still has them while on a radio show called Paranormal Realms and the episode they called, “The last stand”.  She not only does this, but, she actually explains how John Zaffis is involved with the items and how pressure from the owner to the statues and the police, gets him to give the statues back and back away from the heat.  Here’s the thing… in that instance, she admits to the owner WANTING THEM BACK by this admission and certainly knowledge of them wanting them back, (Or why would anyone be inquiring of those statues?) and she admits to the statues being worth money as well and knowing about it.  So she can’t say they are worth a few dollars, as sometimes some other’s suggested.

Now, with this video, there seem to be a bunch of people concerned about the paranormal and really want to clean it up from the bad eggs or paranormal bullies that they exclaim are ruining the field.  It might seem plausible and even admirable if you didn’t know who was involved and just was the truth and what wasn’t.  The problem is, the players in this radio show are being defensive of them selves and have taken a page in our play book to deliver a blow to us, however, not to convincingly, as you will see.  You need a bit of a back story to get the full picture and knowing who is who, is the key.  Let me introduce them…

Let’s look at who they are, shall we?  Now the first person I’d like to introduce is Brett Watson.  He’s been a co-host of mine in the past before I knew what type of person he was.  Jill Burrel, the host to this show, was also a co-host at one time with me for a few shows.  Jill and Brett, as you will hear, are close friends and have been for a good long while according to the show host.  Brett proclaims to be an exorcist.  However, he was recently with an order of exorcist under the Secred Order of Saint Michael the Archangel and Bishop Ron Feyl.  BUT, Brett was not an exorcist, even though he touted that title for quite a while.  He was not sanctioned to do exorcisms by the order and had no authority under the order to do them once so ever, because, they only allow ordained clergy to do them and for good reason.  Brett was merely an exorcist investigator, which merely means, he’s an investigator that looks for the signs of demons and can get the order to come and help take care of the problem.  Brett has furnished his online credentials that are questionable pieces of paper to his ordinations of being clergy and an exorcist.  Anything by New Life Ministries is generally of question.

When Brett started his OWN exorcist order and Bishop Feyl found out, he was excommunicated immediately and with the shock of the Bishop.  Brett has a well known video out there doing his own exorcisms in which he is reading scripted stapled pages together in an attempt to do an exorcism.  It truly shows his inexperience in dealing with such a problem, let alone recognizing what to look for in such a case. I think this is enough to demonstrate just some of his issues and why, he may be on that show, as he is someone I exposed for being a fake exorcist in the past.  I have to wonder why Jill is willing to overlook so much with these people.

The next one is Lord Rick Rowe.  Yes, that’s what he calls himself.  This guy has a forum called Theatrical Clowns where he writes excessively about many in a bullying manner himself and has a forum that took my colleague Darlene over 500 screenshots to record and it’s all on me.  He’s been a busy guy screen-shotting various things to add to his collection of “how bad Evan is” forum where no body seems to be adding to or commenting to.  He is a sick puppy.  If someone comments negatively to him about me, it becomes his “proof” against me and it becomes another post of his forum.  He has actually posted a picture of my home, posted a picture of my wife and insulted her and made several pictures of me insulting anything he can about me. He’s even lied on there quite often and named a sex offender as part of my Oregon team when the sex offender was in Montana. He has no problem just making up lies.  I do not profess to be innocent of never insulting the guy, as it’s hard not to with the excessive obsession this guy has all the time with me.

Now I’m sure you are asking, why would this guy do this?  He actually got mad at me for NOT INVITING HIM ON MY RADIO SHOW.  That’s right; I didn’t invite him on my show.  It’s not that he asked first and I said no even.  I didn’t see how great he was and have him on my show on my own; therefore, I treated him badly and needed to become another victim of his clowning.  Now, the truth is, Lord Rick Rowe has many YouTube videos using the name Angelofthynight where he tokes pot leisurely in front of the camera coming off like a zealot of the dark and frankly, this type of behavior I can not endorse in any way shape or form. His website shows him smoking drugs and strangely his donate buttons for Paypal he has.   He also has stalked others and the proof is right on his pages, which includes a forum on TAPS from “The Ghost Hunters”.  This is classic stalker activity here.

Then there’s the mother that comes on the show… Christina and Leslie’s biological mother, whom like Christina, didn’t spend a lot of time raising her children and had long issues with drug addiction.  Leslie was raised by her grandmother Jewel Jobe, whom was the victim that Christina was highly suspected in abusing and stealing from.  Leslie was then adopted by another family in her young teens.  She was not raised by her mother for the most part.  Christina’s mother does mention about not being perfect and hints to the drug addiction on the show and she also throws in the real reason for her turning on her daughter Leslie which she sees as an awful thing Leslie did which is about the cell phone on their plan that she had that they turned off when she threatened not to have anything to do with Leslie if she came forward on Christina.  Of course, Leslie put her values and morals first, being a victim’s advocate for over 25 years.  We do have court papers and papers from officers to an alleged assault that show that Christina’s mother was at one time against what Christina had done and closer to Leslie during the investigation into allegations of abuse by Christina on her grandmother.

While I did not catch her voice on this show, she is worth mentioning and that is Carol Malone, who was previously reported that a neighbor was her lawyer.  When we called him, he claimed he wasn’t and that she was merely his neighbor and was a bit shocked and even wrote a letter to Blog Talk Radio on my behalf after she wrote on my group page that he sent a “cease and desist” letter to the online radio host.  According to Carol Malone, this same lawyer was supposed to have possession of the statues.  However, Christina does not state any lawyer or Carol Malone has having possession of the statues.  Carol did try to extort $145 from the owner of the statues for an appraisal that could not have been done if she was never in possession of them.

Now that you have some back story take a listen. Remember, they are defending themselves and downing us, rather then truly looking to stop abuse of OTHERS here.  It is tell tale to what they are really about and judge for yourself.

Paranormal Realms “The Last Stand” with Brett Watson, Jill Wilder (Burell), Christina George, Christina George’s mother, Lord Rick Rowe and Carol Malone (all defending themselves)

https://www.spreaker.com/user/7573949/lastrealm

Brett Watson’s Fake Exorcism http://youtu.be/qTThZBxeQ8Q

Radio show where we exposed Christina George.

https://www.spreaker.com/user/7573949/b-t-e-o-r-network-fairy-tale-psychic

Even page where all the proof is posted on Christina George.

https://www.facebook.com/events/262647093939424/?ref_dashboard_filter=past

By Evan Jensen

Producer of Beyond the Edge of Reality Radio Network

https://www.facebook.com/beyondtheedgeofrealitynetwork

https://www.facebook.com/paranormalbureauofinvestigation

https://www.facebook.com/beyondtheedgeofrealitydesigns

Web pages

http://beyondtheedgeofreality.net


http://beyondthedgeofreality.com

Blogs

http://beyondtheedgeofreality.blogspot.com/

http://hauntedishpeming.blogspot.com/

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge



Friday, July 4, 2014

Special Report - Ryan Buell & the Cancer that is PRS, Part II

By Kirby Robinson

This is Part I -

Topher Young’s credibility as being a debunker is that he is a liar when it comes to what he says about the Eye on the Paranormal. For some odd reason he thinks my weekly column is the only one that appears on the blog site. I really hate to inform Mr. Young that we publish 5 to 7 times a week and will be adding a new column this Monday authored by an archbishop who is fed up by all the crap that is being taught in the paranormal.

Here is our current schedule of bloggers.

Monday - Demonologist Rev. Dr. Bradley Luoma teaches on the subject of demons and spiritual warfare. His posts will be alternating every other Monday with the archbishop.

Tuesday - Lisa Maliga posts items concerning the Dalai Lama.

Wednesday - Evan Jensen has my former spot and expresses his views on all things paranormal.

Every Other Thursday - Lisa Grace writes about the paranormal from a Christian viewpoint.

Every Other Thursday - Chris Baricko shares his views of all things paranormal.

Friday - Reverend Michael Hunnemann shares his views on demons, spiritual warfare and the impact the paranormal can have on people’s spiritual lives.

Every Other Saturday - Pastor Stephen Piersall shares the message of our Lord.

Sunday - Jennifer Auld writes about the paranormal and demonology from a Christian perspective.

We have one or two debunking columns and the rest are teachings. Many speak of demons but does Mr. Young go after them? No. Why? Because he knows by going after me he generates hits from my haters. All of these folks deserve to have their posts read and not get caught up in the ruckus.

People like Mr. Young are playing a very deceitful game themselves but it becomes clearer as we see what went on with PS/PRS by looking at the episodes that aired while Topher was doing Ryan’s bidding. Note that Mr. Young is still protecting his former mentor.

1 [Pilot] “THE SIXTH SENSE” – In this episode the focus is on a young boy who sees dead people. This is the one and only time that Adam Blai appeared on the show.

Mr. Adam Blai is an interesting fellow. He holds a Master’s of Science in Adult Clinical Psychology from Penn State and is a demonologist. Demonology not only as a matter of personal interest but one of faith. He works closely with church performing training sessions on the demonic for Catholic priests. He was also mentored by John Zaffis and has a website of his own for quite some time. http://www.religiousdemonology.com/#

He has 2 books out and will be featured  in a book being released by a major publisher next month concerning a case he worked on that Mr. Buell claimed on his show that it was his case.

If one watches the pilot, you’ll notice that the demon shows not one shred of interest in Ryan, PRS, the production team, or the boy and his family. It is only interested in Mr. Blai.

Mr. Blai was also featured in his own paranormal reality show that, if not for a major PR blunder, would have been maybe the best paranormal reality show. It was called The Exorcist Files.




Has Mr. Young ever asked the following questions?

1 That Mr. Buell proves his claims of being pursued by demons. There are many demons and exorcisms connected to Paranormal State (false by the way). Ryan claims that even as a beginner the Catholic church, with over 2000 years in dealing with demonic, was turning to him for help. This claim is made on Paranormal State and in Ryan’s book. As recently as one year ago, the church was consulting him on what to do in demonic cases. Why is this? It would not be the fact that Ryan’s fans would descend on Mr. Young if they found out it was all fake? Or is it that Mr. Young’s hands are not as clean as he pretends they are?

2 Has he ever asked John Zaffis to prove his claims? There is hardly a major demonic case that Mr. Zaffis’s name is not connected to like the current Conjuring case or A Haunting in Connecticut. Or what about the many demonic claims from his former show The Haunted Collector? Surely Mr. Young would have asked Johnny boy. But he will go after folks that do not have a large fan base. Or those people that never will be featured at a paranormal conference. Maybe Mr. Young might be featured alongside the likes of Mr. Zaffis?

3 Has he ever asked Mr. Blai to prove his claims? Surely a man that has such an impact on the training of priests in the demonic and exorcisms has been on Mr. Young’s radar? Again the answer is no. Maybe Mr. Young is frightened by the fact that Mr. Blai could out debate him. Maybe Mr. Young fears that Mr. Blai might wax too eloquently in any type of debate. This is not my strong suit nor is it the strong suit of Mr. Young and his kind.

2 “THE NAME”

The PRS are called to Elizabethtown, PA to help a woman experiencing paranormal activity in a home that was the site of brutal murders. A supposed entity taunts Ryan by name during the investigation. 

The above is a description of the episode released by the production company even when they knew that the above was a lie.

And this episode is full of lies. Funnily enough, even Mr. Young agrees.

The home was never a site of any type of murder. The graveyard across the road was a resting place for people who had been the victims of a mass murder. The production company knew it was untrue. Ryan and PRS knew it was untrue, yet they allowed the lie to spread.

Now Mr. Young says that these lies and deceptions have all been explained away and there is nothing to these stories. So a lie told to millions is all cleared up if you tell a handful of people the truth. Kinda faulty logic, that. And later we will bring into question one of Mr. Young’s claims that the truth was told by far more credible folk like Loyd Auerbach later in this report.

So on this totally real reality show they lied.

Mr. Young admits that this is a lie: Chip Coffey was never a longtime consultant for PRS prior to his appearance on Paranormal State. Chip Coffey claims he is a Psychic/Medium and on his site he makes a bunch of claims concerning his ability and gives you a chance to part with your money to talk to the dead and learn your future.

A couple of words that I will say in defense of Mr. Coffey, (not the psychic/medium.) He recently has come out concerning the deceptive practices that PRS has been taking part in. For that I applaud him.

Additionally, when Mr. Coffey was on Paranormal State he was just a hired hand and received no producer credit like others. Nor was he was never made a part of PRS like others. Until recently, he was never featured as a part of any field trips, webinars or projects that Ryan and PRS took part in.

Where I question Chip, along with every other psychic/medium/healer/seer, etc., is to prove their claims.

Mr. Young attacks me for my past claims of psychic/mediumship. But what Mr. Young (and those like him) never focus on are the countless times that I have stated that it was the worst thing I ever did. (Along with not becoming an ordained pastor. I am not talking about the type you buy like so many people have done in the paranormal field and that includes Mr. Coffey.) I say that because I was not lying to folks but I was unwittingly being influenced by the demonic. But the type of attack dog that Mr. Young is they never hear.

Now Mr. Coffey has a website and even a book http://www.chipcoffey.com/

It’s filled with claims that must trouble Mr Young.


More tomorrow July the 5. It looks as this will go far longer than just 3 parts and will appear when space is open on the Eye.