By Lisa Grace
Many in the scientific community lie. They call “theory”—“fact.” For the purpose of this article, *real* science is that which is provable, (you can get the same results every time when tested).
Lazy scientists are comfortable misleading people because many of their degrees were earned on the backbone of theory—not fact, and since they are willing to lie to themselves, they are willing to lie to everyone.
Many in the public would flunk a fifth grade test on basic scientific principles as we see so often see on the show “Are you smarter than a fifth grader?” Is it any wonder they take “theory” as “fact” so easily?
So it’s not surprising that carbon dating, evolution, dinosaurs living before man not during man’s time, the speed of light, the dirt layer theory, big bang theory, etc. are all taught as fact when in reality they are not. They are all theories of which there is *real* science available that disputes and proves they are wrong.
What happens to scientists who disprove that commonly held scientific *beliefs* (which take faith since of course, there is no real science backing them up) are wrong?
Since Galileo’s time, including Galileo himself, THEY GET SHUNNED.
Cut off from the equipment, funding, and academic institutions that they need to continue their real scientific research.
Halton Arp (Hubble’s assistant) found the difference in the z shift anomaly (which is an anomaly itself in the red shift) fit a formula (the anomaly of the Z shift, not the Z shift itself.)
Any amateur with the right equipment and knowledge can measure this. ALL of Halton Arp’s research (books and books of it, all the numbers, measurements, and formulas the real data) is based on actual provable measurements and been replicated and confirmed by dozens of others world wide who have a “real” scientific back ground. Thank God for real number geeks.
WHY is this important?
Because it disproves the big bang “theory“, and we know the big bang theory has been taught to be fact. The fact that big bang is wrong (and they’ve known for years there are huge problems with it) is a horrifying concept to all the scientists that were trying to build fact on a quicksand-style theory.
It is so important to get the facts straight in science and use them as building blocks, and not use theory as building blocks.
Many in the science community have forgotten the simple concept of using experiments to get results. The other implication of Harp’s research results (facts) is that it points to our universe as being electric, and also points to the outer reaches as being 3D holographic images.
That is what the results (numbers) of the research indicate over and over again.
If these results (numbers) are correct, and the outer reaches are nothing but 3D images, what does that say about our universe?
You can see now why “real” science is so threatening. Because in every single discipline, real science (based just on measurable, verifiable results not theory) points to a Creator. God bless the science and the scientists brave enough to go where it leads. He created for our universe. He is truly an AWESOME God.