Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Accept Buddha's Teaching Only After Proper Analysis
His Holiness the Dalai Lama has returned to Dharamsala from Ladakh after giving a teaching to local Buddhists on the fundamental precepts and philosophical underpinnings of all the schools of Tibetan Buddhism. He said: ‘'the four traditional schools of Buddhism in Tibet may superficially seem to differ in the way they explain the [Buddhist] view, but ultimately what they refer to is the same [thing]''.
The Tibetan spiritual leader spent four days in Ladakh, a region in Northern India sometime called ‘little Tibet' due to its strong linguistic, cultural and religious ties with Tibet, and, as he has does many times in the past, His Holiness stressed the importance of the authenticity of Buddhist teachings, and being true to the historical Buddha's words.
He stressed, "In fact the Buddha counseled his followers to examine what he taught and to adopt it only if they felt it was worthwhile, not simply out of respect for him''.
On the second day of the teachings His Holiness talked of Dolgyal (or Shugden). He said that he stopped propitiating the spirit many years ago after extensive investigations had revealed it was improper to do so.
His Holiness encapsulated his thinking on the subject of Dolgyal by saying, "anyone who has kept up the practice of Dolgyal out of ignorance should not have any fear about giving it up if they heed his advice.
On the other hand, he said, whatever fierce spirit you choose is up to you, all His Holiness asks is that such persons do not take vows or empowerments from him.''
Turning to other themes, he reiterated his long standing conviction that Buddhism must not just rely on tradition and handed down conventions based on out dated thinking. For example, in reply to some Korean Buddhists a few years His Holiness said, ‘'that he didn't think the Buddha appeared in the world to give cosmic measurements, but to show the way to liberation from cyclic existence''.
Moreover, the pertinent point he made was that if you take refuge in the three Jewels of Buddhism-The Buddha, Sangha and Dharma- it is because you have consciously tried to "overcome all faults and [ripen] all qualities''.
Cultivating Compassion
On the third day, in order to cultivate compassion, and altruism, His Holiness said that an altruistic attitude-to all living beings-is essential if we wish to achieve Buddhahood. His Holiness went through important Buddhist initiations with the congregation for instance the ‘rite to aspire to develop Boddhichitta'. Boddhichitta: meaning the awakened mind that strives for compassion and solidarity with all humans and all other sentient beings.
On the fourth and final day His Holiness the Dalai Lama gave the long life empowerment associated with White Tara (a female deity in Tibetan Buddhism), and symbolically, she is regarded as the feminine aspect of Avalokitesvara.
Amongst other things, His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama went onto discuss the importance of religious tolerance in all parts of the world-not least within the different Tibetan Buddhist traditions and his hope that current tolerance would prevail everywhere.
Finally, His Holiness thanked the congregation and the organizers for making his visit a successful one. His Holiness then conferred the long life empowerment of White Tara and subsequent prayers were conducted in relation to White Tara for his long life. At one point in proceedings, after the sun had come out, he stopped to remark:
"The 13th Dalai Lama was once giving a teaching at Norbulingka on a very hot day and there are reports that you could tell who had attended them by their sunburnt faces. It looks like it'll be the same today."
By Mark Kernan, Tibet Post International - August 17, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
Paranormal Headline Monday– September 10, 2012
By Kirby Robinson
UFO expert Bob Lazar - Real or Fake?
Deep sea UFO hunt turns up a bunch of rocks … but no
UFOs
Psychic Phone frauds still thriving!
Fake Psychic tells all!
New Age crazies keep the money flowing!
Keep current and follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/eyeonparanormal
Saturday, September 8, 2012
This & That Saturday - September 8, 2012
By Kirby Robinson
THE
EYE ON THE PARANORMAL IS GROWING!
If you
write about the paranormal, are reliable, and want to join this group, we still
have openings. Contact us at: freeallspirits@live.com
A Story Everyone Should Enjoy – The Old Cowboy and a Church
One Sunday morning an old
cowboy entered a church just before services were to begin. Although the old
man and his clothes were spotlessly clean, he wore jeans, a denim shirt
and boots that were very worn and ragged. In his hand, he carried a worn out
old hat and an equally worn out Bible. The Church he entered was in a very
upscale and exclusive part of the city. It was the largest and most beautiful church
the old cowboy had ever seen. The people of the congregation were all dressed
with expensive clothes and accessories. As the cowboy took a seat, the others
moved away from him. No one greeted, spoke to, or welcomed him. They were all
appalled at his appearance and did not attempt to hide it. The preacher gave a
long sermon about Hellfire and brimstone and a stern lecture on how much money the
church needed to do God's work. As the old cowboy was leaving the church, the
preacher approached him and asked the cowboy to do him a favor.
"Before you come back in here again, have a talk with God and ask him
what He thinks would be appropriate attire for worship."
The old cowboy assured the
preacher he would.
The next Sunday, he showed
up for the services wearing the same ragged jeans, shirt, boots, and hat.
Once again, he was completely shunned and ignored.
The preacher approached the
man and said, "I thought I asked you to speak to God before you came
back to our church."
"I did," replied
the old cowboy.
"If you spoke to God,
what did he tell you the proper attire should be for worshiping in
here?" asked the preacher.
"Well, sir, God told me that He didn't have a clue what I should
wear. He says He's never been in this church."
A great teaching on the subject of hypnosis and its
ties to the dark side:
I never tire of sharing this video on FALSE TEACHERS.
Run do not walk. to flee from them
EARN EXTRA MONEY! If you have a website, forum or blog you
can set up an Amazon Associates Affiliate Program link and sell the Kindle
version of INVESTIGATING PARANORMAL STATE, PARANORMAL STATE EXPOSED and
PARANORMAL TEACHINGS: THE BEST OF SHEDDING SOME LIGHT and earn money. You can
also sell other books and products that Amazon offers. Here's the link
https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/
Friday, September 7, 2012
Ten Reasons Soul Sleep Is Not Biblical
By Reverend Mark Hunnemann
1. A book frequently appealed to is Ecclesiastes, where it seems to teach soul sleep…..One should NEVER appeal primarily to this book for doctrinal support because the stated perspective is “under the sun”(life without God), which leads to meaningless existence.
An increasing number of Christians are appealing to
the notion of soul sleep as their
primary argument against the notion of ghosts.
This is an in-family discussion, and
while I deeply rejoice in their courage to confront a very serious issue, I am
also concerned that the biblical view of the afterlife is being distorted. What
is soul sleep? It has to do with what is known as the intermediate state—the
time between a person’s death and the Second Coming of Christ. It is the belief
that when we die, our souls remain asleep until Jesus returns. Of course if
this were true, it would be a profound argument against ghosts, but it is not,
and using it is counter-productive. Besides, as I point out in Seeing Ghosts through God’s Eyes, there
are many other cogent arguments which stand on solid biblical ground.
I have to ask
this question: why do people believe in this notion? They sincerely believe the bible teaches it. I
respect that. But, historically there is another reason this notion has arisen.
The reasoning goes like this: if the body cannot exist without the soul, then
the soul cannot exist without the body. That is fallacious reasoning because it
leads to a non-sequitor or false conclusion. When the soul leaves the body,
then that person is dead, and their body will decay. However, there is no
scriptural or anecdotal evidence to support the notion that the soul cannot
exist apart from the body. The soul is the consciousness/essence of a person…it
is spiritual in nature. If in principle we think that a spiritual soul cannot
exist without a body, then how do we explain God, angels, and demons….all of
whom have spirits without bodies—except for Jesus’ body in heaven? They are
disembodied consciousness and personality, so why not the same for humans when
they become disembodied?
2. Also, it is
asserted that since Jesus referred to dead people as sleeping, then that
clearly indicated the souls of dead people are sleeping; Is that not what Jesus said? No. He said they
were asleep…He did not say their soul was asleep. What is asleep, the soul or
the body? Clearly the bible and experience teach that our bodies rest or sleep
until they are resurrected. More to the point, we need to be familiar with the
culture of the time—calling death, sleep
was simply a common euphemism of the day for death—it was not a technical term used to indicate the soul’s awareness level. Meaning is
determined by context, and in this case it is the whole bible.
3.
A survey of church history shows that all three branches (Roman Catholic,
Orthodox, and Protestant) have staunchly supported conscious existence after
death. From the early church fathers to today, conscious existence after death
has been a crucial aspect of classical Christianity. All the Reformers,
historical confessions (e.g., Westminster Confession) as well as the great
Revivalists (Edwards, Whitfield, Wesley, Spurgeon, and Moody) all robustly
affirmed the importance of “when they are dead, they will have never been more
alive!” Moody. John Calvin’s first book was a refutation of the notion of soul
sleep.
4.
Today, the two main groups that affirm soul sleep are Seventh Day Adventists
and Jehovah’s Witnesses; regarding the latter, the late great Walter Martin saw
soul sleep as one of the hallmarks of a cult.
5. Enoch and Elijah
were beamed up into heaven very much conscious….would God take them only to put
them to sleep?
6. Moses and Elijah
appeared with Jesus on the Mt. of Transfiguration and were talking to Him. The
simplest explanation is continuity of conscious existence.
7. In Acts 7 Jesus
stands to celebrate Stephen’s homecoming while he is being stoned to death.
8. Rev. 6:9-11 The current activity and communication of
the souls of believers is seen and heard by John. The topic of their discussion
could only occur during the intermediate state. Crucial text.
9. “…away from the body
and at home with the Lord.” (2 Cor.5:8) one reason I don’t reference Hebrew and
Greek more often is that it can inadvertently cause folks to lose confidence in
their English bibles…which are exceedingly accurate. Clearly Paul anticipates
that death will propel his soul into heaven.
10. Phil.1:21 “For to
me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.” Paul succinctly summarizes his
dilemma and then elaborates. Life or death, Jesus is everything to Paul. If he
stays then he will have a fruitful ministry with them by being a minister of
their joy in Christ. But if he dies…Paul’s longing to be with Jesus will be
fulfilled. Paul yearns for the latter, but his Jesus-like servant heart will
choose to continue to help them. But the point is clear—death is seen as an
immediate entry into Christ’s presence. How could it be considered gain if he said, “I’m excited about
being asleep for 2,000 years…”? Remember Paul had already had a direct vision
of heaven which was unspeakably wonderful. THAT is what he desired above all
else.
11. “But you have come
to Mt Zion and to the city of the living God….and to the spirits of the
righteous made perfect.” Heb.12:22-24 Note that it says… you have come…a present reality (same in Greek as in English). This
is a reference to the church militant (us) worshipping with the church
triumphant…NOW!. The righteous made perfect are the glorified
souls of believers in heaven who are worshipping God now. Dr. Edmund Clowney,
commenting on these amazing verses, states that when believers join for
corporate worship, then we are mystically united with the departed saints in
worship of the living God--with Jesus as the choirmaster (2:12)! “Truly, I say
to you, today you will be with Me in
Paradise.” (emp. added) Lk23:43 If one has a solid grasp of the central
doctrine of union with Christ, there is no way to believe in soul sleep. By
virtue of being in Christ we are already in heaven! (Col.3:1f)
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Issue 86 Christians Aren't Welcome In the Paranormal Community
By Kirby
Robinson
If you’re a skeptic, able to think, and a Christian you're no longer
welcome in the paranormal community.
I'm often amazed at how God works in the shadows
putting together the pieces of the puzzle of the path that He has me on. I
often say to Him, I've done this enough, it's time to find someone wiser,
smarter, younger, and more articulate than this old country hick. But it seems that
He hasn't found anyone with those qualifications and keeps calling this old
workhouse. His Son went up on the cross for my soul. He had nails driven into
his hands and feet to shed the blood so that we can have victory over not only
death, but the devil, illness and all manners of evil. He also gave us a Word
that was true yesterday, today and for the dark years ahead.
I've wondered why for several weeks my angels have
been close by. [They aren't spirit guides. When they come to me they don't
speak of how important they are, nor do they ever bring up anything other than
the glory of our Lord unless it is to give me a word from the Bible or a
message of warning]. Additionally, memories of life in the new age that I'd put
away so many years ago kept coming back fresh as ever. As did books concerning
the false new age Christ and the empty gospel of the new age church that's sold
out the message of salvation, redemption and the never ending or never changing
Word of GOD.
So what took
place during Friday night's interview on Paranormal Journal didn't come as a
big surprise. And, right after the show, I was sent this message:
"sorry that happened with your interview Kirby.
Personally, I think it was a lack of professionalism on the part of the host's that
conducted the interview. Seems they ( personally ? ) knew each caller that was spewing
verbal venom and then when it came time to say good-bye, sounded overly
sweet and at least one of the caller's said, I'll talk with you tomorrow.
Couldn't help but notice that the dialog sounded almost the same, like they
were feeding off each other's comments. To me, it sounded like a planned
deal...like I said, the show wasn't conducted in a professional manner.
Host's should have intervened when the callers start to become adversarial and
rude. Just my opinion...but I was pleased with the way you kept your cool and
held your ground Kirby."
We've been given information concerning ties of the
callers to some of the well know para- celebs and groups we have pointed out in
the past with concerns of credibility.
Two of the most troubling callers were:
1 The lady who stated that the death of my child was
no big thing because her child had been ten years old when he died; and mine,
well it was never born, so it was no big issue. Just get over it. Is not all
life precious? That includes an unborn baby that has a heartbeat, feelings and
a functioning brain. So to take her argument [and we do feel sorry for her loss
if she does not feel for mine] we also have to wonder if she would say her
suffering is greater than a parent whose child was 21when they died? You had
him for 21 years, I only had mine for ten, so let me stand in the spotlight of
my suffering. Does this sound healthy emotionally or spiritually--holding onto
suffering like that? We've found out the person goes by the name Lee Anna and
is a para-celeb groupie. She even appeared on Darkness Dave's radio show. We
would hope she informs clients that some of the spirits of the dead are more
and less important, and next time I see and speak to Victoria, my dead child
that Lee Anna says is not that important. Also, we are concerned about her
claims about her dead child, apparently reports range in age from 10 to 12…
2 The other is the woman that claims that the Hindu
religion only has one GOD. This shows a lack of wisdom and knowledge that runs
rampant within the paranormal field. You don't get a solid foundation in
matters of theology just from listening to Coast to Coast radio, Darkness at
the Edge of Town, and attending lectures at paranormal conferences. Guess it's
time to teach how many GODS are in the Hindu religion
Here is more proof [they always come back and say that
site isn't right].
It was also implied by a caller that I didn't respect
other people's religions. This is very odd, as I'm friends with Buddhists,
Christians, Jews, Hindus, Native Americans and even Atheists. If you notice
during the show I stated if a person desired to walk a particular path they can
but that path was not mine. And I would defend their right to do so. But you
always see that Christians are asked to rape their faith to allow others to
practice theirs.
Christ teaches that there is one path unto his Father
and that is through Him. If you don't accept him in your heart and speak of Him
with your tongue, He won't pass you on to His Father—and we can't enter heaven.
This is all going on while demons and sometimes the devil himself stands in the
court of heaven pointing out our errors to GOD.
That is pretty black and white. For us, that is the only
path that will work. If we accept that by works or some other path will get you
into heaven, that makes us betray our faith.
My spirituality teaches my GOD is supreme. Sorry about
that, if you follow a GOD outside of the GOD who created all this and gave up
His Son for us. If you want to follow a different GOD -- fine it is your choice.
But again, Christians are asked to bring their GOD and make him just one of the
members of the GOD Crew.
3 I was attacked by one caller as seeking fame for the
book I'm working on claiming that I'm profiting off the suffering of others.
Let me ask this…aren't the producers of Ghost
Adventures profiting off the family's suffering? Have they donated money
made from the show's airing? Will they donate any money from the sale of the
DVD to charity? If so, which charity? How much have they donated? Can we see
any records from the producers?
And let me say this about Ghost Adventures.
1 It's odd that in every single investigation
something happens.
2 Where is the proof that they are ever locked down
for the entire night? One site had a report from a law officer state he saw the
team calmly walk out of the building they were locked down in so they could
take a break, only to return later on.
3 Have they ever shown their footage of being
demonically attacked to theologians who are expert in the subject of demons? Theologians
have no ties to the paranormal community or financial interest in the spreading
of false teachings to get their take on whether it's real or not.
4 I should come out and say I personally feel the show
Ghost Adventures is fake. And just
like that other fake para-reality show, Paranormal
State, sometimes they stumbled onto real cases. This was seen in the Paranormal State episode with Kelli
Ryan. They didn't really know how to deal with it and properly present it to
the public.
I would love to go on one of their investigations with
my own people to record what really goes on. Others who doubt the show and made
the same request haven't received a response, because much of what goes on is faked.
NEXT WEEK – We go into the chatroom and do what we do
so well – expose darkness to the light. I'm not ashamed to be a skeptic and
free thinker. I have the courage of my convictions because if I don't then I have
no courage or convictions.
EARN EXTRA MONEY! If you have a website, forum or blog you
can set up an Amazon Associates Affiliate Program link and sell the Kindle
version of INVESTIGATING PARANORMAL STATE, PARANORMAL STATE EXPOSED and
PARANORMAL TEACHINGS: THE BEST OF SHEDDING SOME LIGHT and earn money. You can
also sell other books and products that Amazon offers. Here's the link
https://affiliate-program.amazon.com/
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Dalai Lama: What Do I Really Fear? Being Eaten By Sharks!
Outside the Dalai Lama’s temple complex in Dharamsala, hundreds of young monks in crimson robes are locked in animated verbal combat. Against a Himalayan backdrop of jagged white peaks and a bright iris sky, the next generation are holding a debate, clapping their hands triumphantly when they score a point over their opponent.
Inside the high-security cloisters, the bravado gives way to a more sombre scene as selected devotees wait in line for the man they regard as their living god. These include local teachers waiting to be blessed for their devotion; a wealthy looking white-haired Western man in a black Tibetan robe; and a glamorous young Australian woman in a tight cheongsam and high wedges. As Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, passes down the line, the emotion is too much for some. One young woman starts weeping and locks her fingers into his, holding his fist to her cheek.
At the end of the line, the Dalai Lama stoops to meet the gaze of 81-year-old Lhakchung, a wheelchair-bound tailor now dying of cancer. He looks intently into his eyes. There are tears running down the old man’s lined cheeks – he knows this will be the last blessing before he dies and he is looking for comfort, perhaps even hope. Instead, the man regarded by Tibetans as a living incarnation of the Buddha of Compassion, places a traditional white scarf around his shoulders and urges him to come to terms with his fate. It is at once moving and hard, religious and scientific. “I have nothing to give. I told him to pray. We all have to die,” he explains afterwards, matter-of-factly.
Over the past 53 years, the Dalai Lama has been able to offer little more in the way of hope to Tibetans. Exiled since 1959, he watched helplessly as China imposed its totalitarian rule on Tibet. Today, Tibet is no closer to freedom but, without him, the Tibetans might have been forgotten, simply another group of exiles clinging on to a fragmented culture.
Despite Beijing’s countless efforts to discredit him, the Dalai Lama has become one of the world’s most revered leaders, praised for the non-violent way he has led his people, and has a rockstar-like following (tickets to next month’s lecture tour of Scotland, for instance, sold out within hours). Along with his close friend Archbishop Desmond Tutu, he remains one of the last great surviving 20th‑century icons of peace.
Tomorrow he will be in London to receive the Templeton Prize at St Paul’s Cathedral. The honour is awarded annually to someone who has encouraged common ground between science and religion – Mother Teresa was its first recipient – and, with its £1.1 million purse, is by some measure the world’s largest prize. The Dalai Lama will announce how he is to spend the money during the ceremony. The award follows the 1989 Nobel Peace Prize for his commitment to non-violence, and highlights his championing of science as a vital element in religious life.
It is hard not to be in awe of a man billed as a living divinity, and his charisma is undeniable. But when I met him in Dharamsala last week, I discovered a less godly and more human leader than I was expecting; one who spoke of his achievements and regrets, his strengths and weaknesses, and his eventual demise, which poses the problem of a successor.
This is an interesting time for the Dalai Lama. Last year he passed the political leadership of exiled Tibetans on to an elected prime minister. He remains their spiritual leader – and the future Dalai Lama will be an exclusively spiritual figure. “So after my death I have no worries about the leader of the spiritual tradition,” he says. “I’ve made a significant contribution regarding the preservation of Tibetan Buddhist culture and also forming a Tibetan refugee community outside Tibet. It is now one of the most successful refugee communities in the world.”
However, his succession is unlikely to be an easy transition. The Karmapa Lama has been touted as Tibet’s next spiritual leader, and in Tibetan spiritual hierarchy he ranks only behind the Dalai Lama and Panchen Lama. But the current Panchen Lama was chosen by Beijing, and followers of the Dalai Lama do not recognise him. The Dalai Lama’s own choice was rejected by China; that particular boy then mysteriously vanished and has not been seen since.
The same could happen with the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation. Indeed, such is his fear of Chinese attempts to impose a pro-Beijing successor that he says the Tibetan people could choose not to have another Dalai Lama at all. “If, at the time I pass away, or even before, the majority of the people feel the Dalai Lama institution is no longer relevant, the institution will automatically cease,” he says, adding, “I am not worried about that.”
The Dalai Lama was born Lhamo Thondup. His family were farmers in the Tibetan region of Amdo, then already part of the Chinese province of Qinghai. He was selected as the “rebirth” of the 13th Dalai Lama at the age of two, by a search party sent to look for the new incarnation. There had been a series of strange omens. For instance, the head of the embalmed 13th Dalai Lama, which was originally facing south-east, suddenly turned to face north-east, so the party headed in that direction. When Thondup was eventually found, he was presented with various items, some of which had belonged to the 13th Dalai Lama. He correctly identified his possessions, crying: “That’s mine! That’s mine!”
At four, Thondup was taken in a procession of lamas (spiritual masters) to the Tibetan capital of Lhasa, and renamed Tenzin Gyatso. His monastic education started at the age of six, but he was still allowed some fun. He describes a childhood in which he loved images of military hardware, marching soldiers and war – in particular Royal Navy gunships from the First World War.
“The war picture books kept by the 13th Dalai Lama, those pictures of the British Navy at the time – their guns, their battleship guns – I found very attractive,” he tells me. It is an unexpected confession for an icon of peace, but he waves away its significance.
“Every child loves a uniform,” he says, recalling children marching behind his Tibetan army parades in Lhasa before his exile.
Indeed, when he met Chairman Mao Tse-tung and Premier Chou En-lai in “Peking” – as he still calls the Chinese capital – for the 1954 talks following China’s invasion of Tibet, Mao himself told him he had a “scientific mind”.
He soon developed a close relationship with both men, despite them having unleashed the might of the People’s Liberation Army on his country. Mao served him with his own chopsticks, and Chou played him at ping-pong. “Chairman Mao gave me food in the Chinese tradition. I felt great honour but also fear. He was a chain smoker, too, lots of coughing, so I thought I might get a virus from his chopsticks,” he says with his trademark naughty giggle.
Mao had initially praised Lord Buddha as a “revolutionary”, but later told the Dalai Lama that “religion is poison”. Despite their closeness, five years later the Dalai Lama was forced to lead his Tibetan government into exile in Nehru’s India. The Dalai Lama made the north Indian hill town of Dharamsala his spiritual centre as well as his home, establishing a “government in exile”. Since then, several thousand Tibetan exiles have settled there.
The Dalai Lama has not had an opportunity to discuss religion – or play table tennis – with today’s Chinese leaders, and to outsiders the prospects do not look good. A series of anti-Chinese protests by monks throughout Tibet in 2008 was brutally put down by armed police, and children were among the estimated 160 killed.
China accused the Dalai Lama of organising the uprising – a charge he denies – and has since charged him with encouraging the self-immolations of Tibetan monks and nuns (there have been more than 30) in protest against government attempts to marginalise the Tibetan language and culture.
The Dalai Lama has so far remained silent, offering them neither support nor condemnation. “If I say anything negative, then their families will feel very sad,” he says. “Of course, I cannot say this is good. So I remain silent. I can only pray and share their determination, their willpower. Nobody normally sacrifices their own life without reasons – they’re concerned about Tibetan culture, Tibetan Buddhist faith.”
He still hopes that China will change its approach to Tibet and will initiate democratic reforms within his lifetime. “My lifetime means if I remain another 10, 20 years, then definitely we’ll see it. If I die next year, I don’t know.”
He believes that the Arab Spring has had a deep impact on China’s thinking, and that Buddhist logic could offer its leaders a way out of totalitarianism. “If they face the reality, then there is no reason for fear or distrust” – which he believes are the product of China’s rule. “A lack of transparency results in distrust and a deep sense of insecurity.”
To some, this might seem naive. China furiously protested when President Obama held talks with the Dalai Lama, for instance. And last October, he was denied a visa to South Africa to attend Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s 80th birthday celebrations (he was due to deliver a lecture). The Archbishop accused the South African government of bowing to pressure from China.
The Dalai Lama’s high profile may also account for reports of an assassination plot. Last year he was warned that Chinese agents had trained Tibetan women to kill him using scarves laced with poison. “They would have said they were sick, to receive a blessing from me, and my hand would have touched them.”
He believes his popularity worldwide is due to his focus on common human desires for happiness and contentment. “Human beings – we are all physically, emotionally, the same. And importantly, everybody wants a happy life. We need money, it’s useful, but if we put all our hopes on these things, it’s wrong. We must look at our inner values, that’s the main thing to bring inner strength, self-confidence and inner peace. The ultimate source of happiness is within ourselves.”
He cites Nelson Mandela, Archbishop Desmond Tutu (“a very close friend; always joking”), Mahatma Gandhi and Albert Einstein as people who inspire him, but says he has been most heavily influenced by the second-century Indian Buddhist monk Nagarjuna. “He said that there is a huge gap between appearances and reality. Appearance is something absolute, but reality is not that way – everything is interdependent, not absolute. So that view is very helpful to maintain a peace of mind because the main destroyer of a peaceful mind is anger.”
But he hasn’t quite mastered this himself, he concedes. He gets angry “quite often” with “advisers, secretaries, other people around me when they make some little, little mistake, then sometimes I burst. Oh yes! Anger, and I shout! And some harsh words. But that remains for a few minutes, then it’s finished.”
At 76, he doesn’t have time to allow his rage to linger. He wakes at 3.30 every morning, meditates for four hours, pounds the treadmill, and then uses Buddhist prostrations to relax. He hasn’t watched television for two years, doesn’t read novels or poetry, but stays up to date with Newsweek and Time and is a BBC radio “addict”. He stops work just after three in the afternoon and is tucked up in bed by 7pm.
He wishes he had been more studious and less playful as a young boy, and regrets not learning to swim. His great fear, though, is of flying and of sharks. “Long flights, those I really feared, but now I’m used to them,” he says. “The fear now is that I never learnt to swim so if the plane crashes on water, I would immediately go deep under the sea and be enjoyed by a shark. That I really fear.”
The greatest single thing in life, he says, is the intelligence of human beings. “With the help of human intelligence, we have the ability to develop infinite love and infinite compassion.”
It is what drives his dedication to others, and inspires his favourite prayer from an eighth‑century Indian Buddhist master. “So long as space remains and suffering of sentient beings is there, I will remain to serve,” he recites. “That prayer really gives me inner strength.”
By Dean Nelson, The Telegraph, May 13, 2012
Labels:
Beijing,
buddhists,
Chairman Mao,
chou en lai,
Dalai Lama,
International Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies,
karmapa lama,
Panchen Lama,
peking,
qinghai,
templeton prize,
tenzin gyatso
Monday, September 3, 2012
Ripperologists
By: Anjel Guyde
We all have this fascination of wanting to know the “unknown”. We want all the puzzles solved, the missing found and criminals held accountable. When it comes to Jack the Ripper, everyone thinks they know the answer. On Amazon, there are almost 3,000 books on Jack the Ripper alone.
Crimes that took place in the Whitechapel District in London in 1888 where murders by the famous “Jack the Ripper”. An organized Serial Killer that brutally butchered women who were mostly prostitutes. An Organized Serial Killer is one that carefully picks the victims and brings the tools to kill the victims and brings them back with him when they leave the crime scene area. This was a calculated man that found his victim, lured her into a place where he felt comfortable and then sliced her throat. With the slicing of the throat you do so for two main reasons, to kill quickly and to stop the victim from screaming. If he cut the throat from behind, there would be blood spatter in front of the victim and across any wall or building. If he cut her throat from the front, he would be soaked in blood. I would have to say that most were cut from behind.
We don’t know exactly how many victims “Jack the Ripper” had killed, but we can estimate with at least five to eleven women were killed by “Jack the Ripper” during the times of April 3, 1888 to November 9, 1888. There are two women that were killed that are not included in the original five victims and they are Emma Elizabeth Smith and Martha Tabram, but these two were the first to be killed in the Whitechapel Murder Files.
For even an organized serial killer, the first victim would have been the most traumatizing and the killer probably wouldn’t have gone to the extremes as he did with his other victims. With the first victim, the Ripper probably would have been close to an area where he lived or worked so if someone came by, he would have a safe place to escape too.
Emma Elizabeth Smith was robbed and sexually assaulted and she had a blunt object placed inside her vagina and she died the next day from peritonitis, on April 3, 1888.
Martha Tabram was killed by being stabbed 39 times on August 7, 1888. There was no obvious motive for her murder. Martha was stabbed mainly in the throat and abdomen. Now since her throat wasn’t slashed, it is still a possibility that the “Ripper” was just beginning of his horrendous crimes.
Some may not except these two victims as a victim of “Jack the Ripper”, but I beg to differ. It shows the crimes increasing and becoming more grotesque. Also, the “Ripper” will venture out into different territories that he may not be so familiar and most likely he will go further out from where he lives because he doesn’t want to be caught and being in different areas, he would have a better chance of not being caught because police departments might have had heightened security in the areas that were already hit.
Serial Killers will normally start out smaller crimes and work toward a more threatening and causing more harm, as his ego would become more excessive, inflated and would feel more powerful over all people, men and women, especially the police. So you would expect that each victim would have more drastic wounds. Serial Killers do not go from extremely dramatic killing to simply strangling someone. The killer would not get that same kind of thrill as he did before.
The other women were part of the “Ripper’s” victims due to the nature of their wounds. Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapmen, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes and Mary Jane Kelly. Now, the last victim, Mary Jane Kelly, was the worst victim because she was in a room that would allow the killer longer time without being seen or heard and he could take his time within the killing and could completely desecrate the Mary Jane Kelly’s body.
It is possible that “Jack the Ripper” knew these women. It’s possible that he was rejected by these prostitutes and he eventually took his rage out on them.
The point to all of this is that this particular case will never be solved. There is no evidence, no witnesses and no DNA to work with. There is no evidence that “Jack the Ripper” ever wrote a letter or any letter. Without having a photo of what was written on the wall over Catherine Eddowes dead body that stated:
“The Juwes are The
Men That Will not be Blamed
For nothing.”
There is no way to realize that the writing is the same or could be compared to anyone else’s handwriting samples since it was ordered to wash that off of the wall. Without that proof of the real “Jack the Ripper’s” handwriting skills, you cannot use the letters that were sent to the police and the newspaper because most of them have been found to be fraudulent. So now you have nothing to state or to use to prove that you know who the identity of the real “Jack the Ripper”.
Patricia Cornwell had stated with the title of her book, “Portrait of a Killer, Jack the Ripper, Case Closed”, she had spent many painstaking hours and over $6 Million dollars of her own money on collecting DNA samples of the letters. She even states that the #1 fact is Most, if not all, of these “Ripper” letters are considered to be hoaxes. She had approximately 600 Ripper letters to go through during her investigation. Even though she believes that she found the real killer as being Walter Sickert, again there is no proof or evidence to him being the real killer.
Then I fell across a book called “Bloodstains” by Jeffrey Mudgett. He believes that his Great Great Grandfather, Herman Webster Mudgett aka Dr. Henry Howard Holmes aka H. H. Holmes was “Jack the Ripper”. Although H.H. Holmes had traveled all over the United States, I have yet to find that he ever left the country, especially going to Europe. H.H. Holmes was a very cunning man whom was attractive to very pretty ladies. If someone he didn’t like someone who came to rent a room in his Chicago Hotel, he would simply turn them away. Holmes was very organized especially when he created his Hotel from Hell. He created a variety of rooms that would seal someone in their room and he could add gas to the room to kill that person from Carbon Monoxide poisoning to sealing up a person in a safe until they ran out of Oxygen. One woman he was going to perform an abortion on her, but instead he chloroformed her and began to dissect her body along with dismembering her. He had in at least 2 cases, extricating the body from all skin, organs, muscles, all the way down to the bones. Once he had the bones, he meticulously wired all of the bones together and will sell the skeleton to a medical school for approximately $200 for a full skeleton. Holmes was interested in being a doctor and did go to school and graduated medical school at the age of 24 at the University of Michigan. Holmes mainly killed for money through life insurance policies. Holmes was inflicted to carry out his crimes due to his greed for money. He might marry a woman for the land she owned and once she was married, she disappeared. Holmes would go and sell off the property and collect the money. He was a mastermind of defrauding people out of their money and items they owned all for greed.
Now, Mr. Jeffrey Mudgett, who wrote “Bloodstains” and is now attempting to prove that his Great Great Grandfather is the famous “Jack the Ripper”. He has tried to use letters that Holmes allegedly wrote against some of the “Ripper Letters”. When you have compare handwriting skills, you have to look at each letter and how it started and stopped. Are their extra loops or a specific way that someone writes one particular letter. Now, when you look at the two letters, the handwriting looks familiar, but they are not. For a handwriting expert to report on this would be very difficult since that style of writing was over 100 years old. But, once again, there is NO PROOF that “Jack the Ripper” ever wrote one letter!
Mr. Mudgett believes that Holmes was overseas during the time of the killings in the Whitechapel District in London. There is NO PROOF that Holmes was ever in Europe. Back in the last 1800’s the only way to get to London would be by way of a Steamship which would take almost 6-7 days on board before reaching Europe. H.H. Holmes at that time was married to Myra/Myrta Belknap in Minnesota in 1887 while Holmes was finishing his “Castle” in Englewood, Illinois. Myra/Myrta and Holmes had a child together, Lucy, who was born in October 1888, which means that she had to have been conceived by January 1888.
Again, let’s look back at the dates of the “Jack the Ripper” killings:
Emma Elizabeth Smith Died April 3, 1888
Martha Tabram Died August 7, 1888
Mary Ann Nichols Died August 31, 1888
Annie Chapman Died September 8, 1888
Elizabeth Stride Died September 30, 1888
Catherine Eddowes Died September 30, 1888
Mary Jane Kelly Died November 9, 1888
Now getting a room on a steamship is very costly, approximately $150-$350 for a one-way passage, that would mean that Holmes would have traveled at least twice to Europe, making it four complete trips that would have cost him approximately $600-$1,400, during the time his daughter was born. Holmes would not have stayed away from his “Castle” for almost a year, nor his new wife almost after conceiving his child. I have not found one thing Mr. Mudgett has stated to prove to me that this is the same man that created such horrendous crimes in another country.
Holmes was convicted of killing 27 people and was hung until dead in the Moyamensing Prison on May 7, 1896. The Castle itself was burnt down in August 19, 1985 and where the Castle once stood is now a Post Office that will be closing down soon at 63rd & Wallace in Englewood, Illinois.
Mr. Mudgett is trying to get paranormal tours down in the basement of the Post Office, but most of that was not part of the original “Castle” property.
Mr. Mudgett is trying to prove that Holmes is “Jack the Ripper” and is creating his second book called:
“The Sequel… Two Plus Two = 5… The Trial of H. H. Holmes as JTR!”
Seriously, anyone that believes that his Great Great Grandfather was “Jack the Ripper” has got be delusional. Show me the proof and not make accusations in attempts to sell more books that you cannot even get in a real book store. Mr. Mudgett states that he found this through his Great Great Grandfather’s writings, but he never has shown even one page to anyone to check the handwriting. He will only show a small sampling. There is only one picture of Herman Webster Mudgett and he states that he even looks like the sketches. Of course he does, back then most men had the same kind of mustache and wore hats, just like Holmes did in those times.
The point is that finding out who the real “Jack the Ripper” will never be solved because there is NO EVIDENCE to prove who he was. Show me the proof, real physical proof and maybe I’ll consider it, but there is nothing to be found. It will always remain a mystery, let it stay that way.
Mr. Mudgett needs to find a new topic to write about, maybe one that he can prove his facts before stating anything that can be proven otherwise.
This article was originally posted on SciFake.com
Labels:
1888,
anjel guyde,
bloodstains,
carbon monoxide poisoning,
dr. henry howard holmes,
herman webster mudgettt,
jack the ripper,
jeffrey mudgett,
ripperologists,
walter sickert,
whitechapel murder files
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


